PLANNING
COMMITTEE MEETING 20/11/12
My name is Ted Razzell and i've been in Llanllwni
since 1971. I want to put it to the committee that RES information, concerning
the impact of sound levels on the local community, is unreliable and
misleading. I've heard from neighbours suffering from noise problems, produced
by the existing nearby wind farm called
Alltwalis. So I'm concerned about the
possible repeat of the problem from this application, and I've looked into the
sound issue to see what was behind it. // A process called ETSU 97 R has been used
here to determine where turbines may be placed to produce acceptable levels of
sound at the homes of local people. Local background noise was measured and set
against turbine noise to produce a residual extra noise. Getting an accurate
measure of ambient noise raises problems, especially in a very tranquil place like
Llanllwni but I don't have time to explore these issues. Instead I will look at
how turbine noise is measured. Close up, very little noise can be perceived at
ground level but, at blade level, it's another question. // Air turbulence here
creates both audible & inaudible sound with a pulsating low frequency noise.
ETSU doesn't allow for low frequency noise to be considered when measuring
total turbine noise, since it isn't thought to be a serious nuisance and is therefore
discounted. However, a considerable amount of empirical research has been
carried out in the last few years, in response to many neurological complaints
from people living near wind farms. In 1996, when ETSU was designed to offset
complaints, there was very limited knowledge about the impact of low frequency sound, and
turbines were much smaller. It is now found from evidence gathered globally
that, in fact, LF noise can cause many neurological difficulties, such as insomnia,
depression, migraine, vertigo and loss of concentration. This situation has
been recognized by the prestigious British Medical Journal which calls for
urgent independent research and the WHO which is concerned about human rights
on this issue. Also, I was particularly
impressed by the work of Dr Amanda Harry, a neurological expert, who explained
in depth the pathology of sound related illness. Equally worrying is the fact
that low frequency sound can be heard over large distances and can penetrate house
walls which raises even more serious issues about the ETSU process. In fact, some
British researchers have labelled this process as "not fit for
purpose". // To sum up then, I suggest that, given all the available
evidence, it is unwise to accept assurances about sound levels and their impact
on people's lives. So, this application should be turned down to ensure that the
health of even more local residents isn't put at risk!
Ted, your full of it!!! And I'm glad you state the year you moved here. No birth rights. It's not your land, or your fore fathers to decide upon. Please state only the proven facts, as anything over and obverse this is liable to court action! You can't just make up montages!!! You obviously know zero about renewable energy, or the need for it. And the main argument you and your supporters have? You don't want to look at them. Well Ted, this is the 21st century, and I would like to leave a sustainable energy for my kids, if that bothers you people who have moved to the area to retire, then I think the solution is clear.
ReplyDeleteOh dear our flamer is back, large absence of facts from his piece too I see oh well.....
ReplyDeleteOh dear, our local ranter is at it again. You can always tell when somebody has nothing rational to say when they indulge in personal attacks - how pathetic! Mr. Ling is not at all concerned about people's health and is quite happy to see local unspoiled tranquil countryside turned into an in industrial zone just to promote an inefficient unreliable technology. Not much of a nationalist are you when happy to see Wales disfigured!
DeleteYour correct, I am not at all concerned about people's Heath. There is no reason to be! And as far as facts go, there are few contained within this whole site. And for the record, it seems you two are the local ranters! I am only requesting you publish factual information. Not silly pictures of turbines spaced about 3m from one another!! If you are honestly worried about the issues you have raised, then I can provide you with information which should lower your concerns. In this case, I would guess that the site will be re configured, with maybe one extra turbine, it would then total over 50MWs then go to the IPCC. And you know they don't take visual impact into consideration.
ReplyDelete