Sunday 14 August 2011

WIND FARMS AND BIODIVERSITY





It is clear policy of the UK Government to promote bio-diversity in Britain, recognizing that there is a problem with certain species of wildlife  going out of existence. In a BBC broadcast on Monday 18th July, Chris Packham looked into the damage done to woods, heaths and moorlands in Britain and the decline in the amount of unspoiled  areas with a consequent negative impact on such wildlife. He argued that the government policy of halting the effect on biodiversity is being undermined by this decline which leads to the disappearance  of certain types of wildlife such as birds, butterflies and animals etc. Carmarthen Council also have a policy of promoting biodiversity  but the 3 threatened giant wind farms proposed for the Mynydd Llanllwni and Brechfa Forest area would, if given permission, have the effect of continuing the decline of such unspoiled forest/heath lands and thus be in direct contradiction  to central and local government policy i.e. the decline in bio-diversity  would be made even worse!

There are, of course many other reasons why these planning applications should be turned down, such as their cumulative impact on visual and noise pollution, which in turn would have a detrimental effect on local amenity and tourism. However, whereas human beings have at least the theoretical option of moving away from this area, the local flora and fauna don't really have  that option. This situation points to the far better and more economic policy of using solar energy where panels can be situated in waste areas and well away from mountain tops!   

Saturday 16 July 2011

Wind Reduction

The 'Times' today has a report that the Climate Change Committee, set up by the Government, has warned that global warning will diminish winds, making turbines less viable. A subject worth tracking down!

Wednesday 22 June 2011

Solar costs to fall rapidly

New information on the economics of solar power was provided in the Guardian on June 21st. According to Ernest and Young, "Solar energy will soon make commercial sense as panel costs plummet". Based on broker reports and industry analysis, E and Y forecasts that the price per unit of generating capacity by 2013 will be close to 1$ compared with 2$ in 2009. So large scale solar projects could be commercially competitive without government support within a decade. This forecast is good news for those of us who believe that there is a better option for producing renewable energy than the controversial, inefficient, unreliable, damaging onshore windfarms!  

Wales' Wind Farm Burden - some facts

1. There are 2.4 wind turbines per 100 square kilometres in tiny Wales; 1.7 in Scotland and 0.5 in massive England. Our small country, reliant on tourism as our only industry, has almost 5 times the density of England. [source Renewables UK, reported in The Times 16 June 2011]

2. The border counties of Cheshire, Shropshire, Hereford and Worcs and Gloucester have 60% of the area of Wales and no windfarms - Wales has 38 and rising.

3. Wales already produces almost 3 times its energy needs, so has no need of more wind turbines. 

4. Christopher Booker in his article 'Greenpeace in Our Time' declares IPCC [ Sunday Telegraph 19 June 2011] reveals the constant lies by the IPCC, the incredible and unaffordable cost of wind energy and calls it 'one of the greatest follies of our time'. £100 billion over the next 9 years is being committed to wind turbines by the Government, i.e. taxpayer*, plus ongoing subsidies for their life span. 

*Close to 90% of taxation now comes from the taxpayer, as companies increasingly avoid corporate and other forms of taxation. It used to be 40%, 40 years ago. VAT paid by companies ultimately comes from the taxpayer in the form of higher prices.

 

Saturday 18 June 2011

Welsh government climb down?

Great news from the Welsh Government. First Minister, Carwyn Jones, has made the following points:
1)Planning guidelines on the number of windfarms should in future be regarded as an upper limit
2)He wants the UK Government to devolve powers over large-scale energy generation projects
3)He says that the number of applications and declarations of interest are higher than anticipated
4)That we cannot accept a position where decisions made outside Wales will lead to inappropriate development for the people of Wales
5)The Welsh Government believes this level of development is unacceptable in view of the wider impact on the local area.
This policy change will prove particularly important where planning applications are turned down by local authorities and are taken to appeal by developers to Planning Inspectors. Meanwhile it is to be hoped that politicians will turn their attention to using solar power for producing clean energy. This source has the benefit of being more reliable and far less intrusive. As pointed out by Leonie Greene from the Renewable Energy Association in the Guardian on the 14th June, " the latest report by expert consultants anticipates a 37% drop in solar costs between 2010 and 2020. Prices dropped  around25% last year alone".
Meanwhile at a local level we have noticed that the wind farm at Alltwalis was shut down for over 5 days recently due to its output being surplus to requirements!
No doubt the operating company will receive generous compensation for this situation as we have seen recently elsewhere.

Thursday 31 March 2011

Are windfarms a real source of renewable energy?

To access an interesting article on this subject by Mark Buchanan in the 30 March edition of New Scientist contact http:/t.co/LsSOM46

Wednesday 23 March 2011

Wind and Solar Subsidies Drying Up In Europe

 Wind and solar energy subsidies are experiencing drastic cutbacks in many
 European nations and some places in the United states

 Wind and Solar Subsidies Drying Up In Europe

 - Jack Dini Saturday, March 19, 2011

 Wind and solar energy subsidies are experiencing drastic cutbacks in many
 European nations and some places in the United states

 In a radical change of policy, the Netherlands is reducing its targets for
 renewable energy and slashing the subsidies for wind and solar power. It has
 also given the green light for the country's first new nuclear power plants
 in almost 40 years. Why the change? Wind and solar subsidies are too
 expensive. Holland thus becomes the first country to abandon the EU-wide
 target of producing 20 percent of its domestic power from renewables. (1)

 Italy's government passed a decree to stop solar energy and deep cuts in
 wind energy due to their high costs to consumers and technical problems
 integrating these sources into the existing infrastructure. (2)

 Lawrence Solomon reports that December 2010 was a bad month for subsidies
 (3):

 Spain slashed payouts for wind projects by 35% while denying support for
 solar thermal projects in their first year of operation.
 This latest round of Spanish cuts followed announcements in November that
 payouts for solar photovoltaic plants would be cut by 45%.

 France announced a four-month freeze on solar projects and a cap on the
 amount of solar that can be built. These measures and others continue a
 retrenchment that saw industry payouts cut twice last year, and that will
 likely continue as opposition grows to France's rapidly using power tax on
 electricity.

 The German government announced it may discontinue the solar industry's
 sweetheart tariffs in 2012. This latest announcement follows a surprise
 reduction in 2009 and another reduction to start in 2011.

 Solomon also reported that in October, New South Wales, Australia's most
 populous state, slashed by two-thirds the revenue that homeowners who had
 installed solar panels would receive from 60 cents per kilowatt-hour to 20
 cents. New South Wales overnight went from being Australia's most generous
 to least generous subsidizer. Also in October, the UK government announced
 that withering spending cuts were coming to renewable projects. (3)

 Florida, Idaho, Kentucky, Rhode Island and Virginia either cancelled or
 delayed renewable energy projects
 In the US, state regulators in Florida, Idaho, Kentucky, Rhode Island and
 Virginia either cancelled or delayed renewable energy projects that would
 raise rates for consumers. (3)

 Why?
 Thanks in part to the wind farm subsidies, Danes pay some of Europe's
 highest energy tariffs—on average, more than twice those in Britain. (4)

 In Spain, 'green jobs' can require a subsidy of $1,000,000 per job.
 Wind-related jobs in Denmark are subsidized at the rate of 175 to 250
 percent above average pay, roughly costing taxpayers $90,000 to $140,000 for
 each 'green' employee. (5) Spain increased its electricity costs for
 households and small businesses 20% between January 2010 and January 2011.
 The government's official explanation of this increase is the huge bill for
 renewables' subsidies. Industry's electricity costs have risen 110% and
 Spain has over 20% official unemployment. (6)

 Extreme green Ontario is experiencing rate hikes 50 times greater than those
 countenanced in some US jurisdictions. (3)

 Summary

 Green jobs cannot reduce unemployment when they require significant
 government assistance. When the President and Congress talk about green
 jobs, they are talking about ones created via federal tax breaks, subsidies,
 or outright mandates. For example, wind and solar-generated electricity
 already enjoy subsidies nearly 50 times higher per unit of energy output
 than ordinary coal and 100 times higher than natural gas. (7)

 Kenneth Green sums this up quite well: "With $2.3 billion in Recovery Act
 tax credits allocated for green manufacturers, President Obama and other
 Democratic politicians have high hopes for green technology. But their
 expectations clash with both economic theory and practical experience in
 Europe. Green programs in Spain destroyed 2.2 jobs for every green job
 created, while the capital needed for one green job in Italy could create
 almost five jobs in the general economy. Wind and solar power have raised
 household energy prices by 7.5 percent in Germany and Denmark has the
 highest electricity prices in the European Union. Central planners in the
 United Statestrying to promote green industry will fare no better at
 creating jobs or stimulating the economy." (8)

 References

 Andrew Orlowski, "Holland slashes carbon targets, shuns wind for nuclear,"
 The Register, February 2, 2011

 P. Gosselin, "Arrivederci Solare! Italy Pushes to Cut Solar Subsidies,"
 notrickszone.com, March 7, 2011

 Lawrence Solomon, "Green Collapse," Financial Post, December 3, 2010

 Andrew Gilligan, "An ill wind blows for Denmark's green energy revolution,"
 telegraph.co.uk, September 12, 2010

 Ed Hiserodt, "Danish Wind Power Overblown," the american.com, September 15,
 2009

 Gabriel Calzada Alvarez, "Greenpeace Still Tilting at Windmills in Spain,"
 Institute for Energy Research, February 15, 2011

 Ben Lieberman, "Green Jobs: Environmental Red Tape Cancels Out Job
 Creation," The Heritage Foundation, February 4, 2010

 Kenneth P. Green, "The Myth of Green Energy Jobs: the European Experience,"
 American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy, February 2011


(Canada Free Press - March 19, 2011)

 http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/34596


Thursday 24 February 2011

latest news

The Save Our Mountain Group yesterday presented to Carmarthen Council
its reaction to the RES Environmental Impact Statement. Good news from
Swansea where a proposal to install a wind farm in a situation very
similar to the Bryn Llywellyn one was finally turned down by the Welsh
Assembly Government inspector. Meanwhile it is very encouraging to see
large numbers of placards opposing our local wind farm appearing
outside peoples' houses.

Thursday 20 January 2011

strategic mistake

It seems the UK govt. has made a strategic mistake in continuing to
pour billions of scarce capital into onshore windfarms. Not only are
other countries like Denmark and Holland having second thoughts about
this so called green energy but also France is tightening up
regulations after health concerns have come to light.
Now there is clear evidence from the UK about the efficency and
reliabilty of these huge wind turbines. During the last 3 winters, the
performance of this technology has been abysmal due to high pressure
weather producing very little wind at a time of high demand for
electricity. For more details please look at the articles section of
this website.
How much longer is this Tory led govt. going to carry on wasting
scarce resources at a time of austerity?